<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ownership on securecode.dev</title><link>https://securecode.dev/tags/ownership/</link><description>Recent content in Ownership on securecode.dev</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://securecode.dev/tags/ownership/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why Vulnerability Management Programs Fail Without a Defined Process</title><link>https://securecode.dev/insights/why-vulnerability-management-programs-fail-without-a-defined-process/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://securecode.dev/insights/why-vulnerability-management-programs-fail-without-a-defined-process/</guid><description>&lt;p>Ask most engineering organizations if they have a vulnerability management program and they&amp;rsquo;ll say yes — they have a scanner, a bug bounty inbox, and a spreadsheet or ticket queue where findings land. Ask if anyone could explain what happens to a finding between the moment it&amp;rsquo;s reported and the moment it&amp;rsquo;s closed, and the answers get vague fast. That gap is usually the real problem.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>