Security review covers two related needs: getting security right while something is still being designed and built, and understanding the real risk posture of a service that’s already live. Both are grounded in the same method — threat modeling, architecture review, and secure code review — applied at whichever point in the lifecycle a team needs it.
Focus areas
- Secure design and trust-boundary review for application features, APIs, and internal services
- Threat modeling for authentication, authorization, multi-tenancy, admin functions, and sensitive workflows
- Secure code review targeted at exploitable weaknesses and systemic engineering issues
- Full security engagements on existing, already-shipped services — architecture, code, configuration, and operational controls reviewed as a system, not just a diff
- Security practice program support for teams formalizing review practices and design gates
Engagement style
This work is collaborative by default. Engineering leaders, staff engineers, security teams, and product owners are included where decisions are made so fixes can be prioritized with real context.
Outputs emphasize practical remediation, reusable patterns, and process improvements that remain valuable after the engagement ends. Timelines scale with scope; most engagements run a minimum of two weeks.